A riff on the difference between narratives and alibis, and a bit of juvenile delinquency, cut from Happy Hour is for Amateurs:
You can’t succeed in law without lying. It’s just a simple fact. But you also can’t make things up. How do you thread the needle? With something we know as the “narrative.”
One of my earliest experiences with narratives was in high school, senior year. After I’d already been accepted to college, and there was little, if any, point in even showing up for classes. I was drinking 40s of malt liquor with buddies in the parking lot and walked into a morning assembly late. The vice principal at the time, a strange, disturbing man, grabbed me at the conclusion and dragged me to his office. All I could think the whole way down the corridor was Where the hell are my breath mints? Did I leave them in the fucking locker? And Whatever the defense is this time, it had better be damned solid. The V.P. was a king crawling creep, and our previous run-ins had been rough. I didn’t like the guy – couldn’t, and wouldn’t, respect him. I’d seen him hanging around gym classes, fawning over a couple wrestlers. Nothing overtly untoward, but his appearances seemed more than coincidence. The timing was near impeccable. That and the look on his face – the way he’d pat kids on the shoulders and stare while we were playing basketball. The guy had these huge black pupils, as if his eyes were permanently dilated. Never showed an expression. Just stood there with his arms across his chest, his thin, flimsy torso hunched inward, planted on a set fat old woman’s hips.
I didn’t know much at that age, but I was certain of this on instinct: A man isn’t supposed to look like that.
He’d nailed me just a few weeks before, on the silliest of minor offenses. I’d shown up late for school, with an explanation that my computer hadn’t been working. Had to stop at my mother’s office to print out a history paper due that day. He wouldn’t accept the excuse, signed by my mother or not. I’d reminded him who paid his salary, that in any logical estimation of the hierarchy at hand, the customer was always right. This didn’t go over well.
I’ll bet if I offered to take off my shirt for you in the boy’s locker room this negotiation would go differently.
Now here I was again. And worse, getting busted for drinking at school, zero tolerance shit. They’d call my folks in for a meeting, make me do charity work for some rehab facility – royal fucking annoyances.
Can’t you just leave me alone? I’ve already been accepted to two colleges better than eighty percent of the kids in this place. You don’t like me, I don’t like you, but who really gives a shit? You go back to your office; I’ll behave through my classes. In a few months’ time, we’ll never see each other again. There’s nothing at all to be gained by laying on the Billy Budd treatment.
Sometimes that pitch has a chance… but not with a man like this. A childlike reverence for “duty,” a mechanized approach to procedure – these things eclipsed his common sense. Or provided a pretext for vindictiveness. I’ll teach you a lesson, you little shit.
I’d been in this spot before – had an odd problem with authority through most of my young adult life. Never bucked it for spite, never went looking for trouble. When it found me, though, and it would, I’d treat it like an irritation. Take their punishment in stride. Chalk it up as a lesson. But they always wanted more – deference, remorse… a concession that they knew best, that my apologies were more than lip service. More than a survival response you offer when you’re under the stick.
All I could offer was attention, and that only because I’d been caught. Who was I to affirm them, and who were they to demand it? And why the fuck even ask? What on Earth is the value of an 18 year old’s validation? An offer of false contrition from the mouth of an adolescent male? “Yes, sir. For a second there, five minutes ago, sandwiched between thinking about where I’m next going to fuck my girlfriend and who’ll be throwing a keg party this weekend, it struck me – just how majestic and infallible your rule book is. Thank you for showing me the light.” How do you “kiss the ring” of someone ridiculous enough to demand that kind of vacant tribute?
The V.P. got behind his desk, adjusted his collar and started the Fifth Degree:
“You came into assembly late.”
“I had car trouble. It’s an old truck.”
“You came in late and went to the men’s room twice. And your eyes are glazed.”
“I have a personal issue. A family matter.”
“Oh really?”
“Yes, really.”
“What exactly.”
“I’ve been upset.”
“About what?”
“We’ve had a death in the family.” Which was true. An aunt I saw maybe once every two or three years had passed away suddenly and unexpectedly a few days before, killed in an accident. I hadn’t known the woman very well, but she was hooking me up huge right here.
“A death in the family?”
“An aunt.”
“I’m–well, uh…” He couldn’t bring himself to “sorry,” even sarcastically.
“It’s just… you know… So shocking. How a person is gone like that.”
This is where I tell you I felt guilty about using that bit. And I guess if I were writing the kind of book that was aimed at the kind of reader who needs that sort of apology, that’s exactly the one I’d be making. But this isn’t that book, you’re not that reader, and if there’d ever been any remorse, these words wouldn’t be here, and I wouldn’t be snickering as I type them. No, the situation here was serious, beyond those provincial concerns. There wouldn’t be mercy for truth, and there was nothing to gain from hedging. The only solution was a call-out. Test the son of a bitch.
He’d have had me dead to rights if he were the kind of man who’d push things. I smelled like a wino and all he had to do was lean in and sniff my breath. That and get beyond the mutually exclusive options – rather than assuming one story true and the other false, considering both might be fact. That yes, there’d been a death in the family, and also, yes, I’d been drinking. He didn’t take either tack. Just sat there looking at his phone, the gears turning in his head. Do I call the kid’s cards? Ring his folks to verify the story? How awkward could this get?
Very.
In the context of an either/or scenario, I was holding an ace, and he was as slow and predictable as any other lifelong rule custodian, but hardly an outright fool. It didn’t take a trainload of brains to gauge how this thing would cut. Door Number One? I’m crazy. Crazy and drunk and the mere suggestion of a call to my family breaks me – gets me whiny and apologetic. But he was holding his hand near the phone, trying to goad me into cracking and I wasn’t saying a word. Not because that was my “play.” Just because I didn’t want to speak. I wasn’t sure how bad I smelled, but I knew Olde English 800. Its scent stuck on your breath like garlic. Sweet, with a hint of rotting fruit, like the stink of Thunderbird on the drunks who bought us the stuff.*
Door Number Two? I’m serious. He calls my folks and confirms the story and then he’s stuck looking weak – stuttering like the principal apologizing to “George Peterson” in Ferris Bueller’s Day Off. I sit there across the desk, watching his hand get called, and trumped. Then I joke about the incident with friends, and in addition to dearth of respect the guy already has among students – being a slope shouldered, middle-aged virgin in a thankless, payless position – he’s got to sit in his office knowing a pack of rotten shits is laughing as they imagine him blubbering. “Oh, well… I’m sorry for your loss then. It’s just that your son– He seemed… Well, nevermi– Please accept my condolences.”
In either case, he wasn’t going to win. I had a bulletproof “narrative” – the only thing better in the dock than a detailed alibi. Some people don’t see the difference, and that’s strange because they’re nothing alike. An alibi’s a set of facts, tactile and easy to test. You can prove one or two didn’t happen, or at least put their veracity in question. And from there, true or not, the rest of the story is suspect. Narrative’s lying via spin – sticking to the actual events, fabricating their impact. And in a situation like mine, where the only witness to the crime was the accused, all that can ever matter is what comes from the advocate’s mouth.
And so we sat for a moment or two, him looking at me, me looking at him, both of us knowing what had happened, and why it’d never be admitted. Prove what I’m saying’s untrue. That these glassy eyes are from booze, and not from the pain of loss.
“Get back to class and understand… I’m watching you.” He waved me out of his office.
Of course you are.
______________________________
* The 8 Ball gets you every time.




Haha speaking of 40’s I drank about four last night. I’m still feeling the alcohol quite a bit, and my sweat reeks of ethanol and toxins. Such is the glamorous college life. A summer session at a mostly commuter school in the heart of Long Island Guido Country necessitates alcoholism.
PL: Christ, that’s serious pollution. But having been to clubs in that part of the world, I understand the numbness needed for dealing with the Guido.
Check this out: http://nj-guido.com/ Hysterical.
Ah yes, the narrative. Never lie but as I always say “form the truth to fit your needs”. If everything you say is true to a degree the only way to get blown up is if someone actually sees it. Then the question becomes: What did they actually see?
My view of the narrative is that humans have a fear of the unknown and conversely the fear of being wrong. Through the narrative, those fears can be exploited.
When I was a prosecutor, the winning cases were the cases where I had a confession. Other than that is was anybody’s guess as to the result because the defense uses the unknown, no matter how slight or pathetic, to fear enough of the jurors into a not guilty verdict.
PL: Trial lawyers have been making bank for decades pushing narratives. Give a jury a compelling “story” and they’ll take it over sober analysis of facts every day of the week.
Excellent. And I’ve been drinking Bombay Sapphire every other night. Custom in Japan is for the senior students to treat their juniors, so I figure this would be the best time to go down your list of recommendations. Great stuff, cuts like a motherfucker though. Only had that and Tanqueray on the rocks, so far though. Anxious to try them in Martini form.
PL: I fired through a bunch Bombay martinis over the weekend myself. Cleanest stuff on earth. No pain, all gain.
This usually doesn’t work in a developing nation. Manipulation of narrative in high school grounds in this context I mean. If you are drinking, most likely someone did die. There is less of a chance that you are doing it for fun because of diminished quality of life. For that to happen, you would have to be rich and/or the son of a politician, and no authority would try to reprimand you anyway. Ironically, if you are rich and/or the son of a politician, would probably also mean that you are soon going to a good-but-not-great US college. Interesting.
PL: I guess, but out of curiosity, what does it happening in a developing nation or not matter? It’s a story about being drunk in high school in America.
Brilliant, good or bad, I’ve been doing the same thing for years. In my opinion this whole piece about narratives is essentially what a trial comes down. How can the two different lawyers put their spin on facts to convince a jury that they’re “right”.
PL: Which is why society doesn’t, and never will, respect lawyers. It’s a sleazy skill set. Everybody in a court room’s lying on at least one or two issues.
If a jury’s decision were considered a real, final objective verdict on the truth of something, wouldn’t we then prosecute the loser for some form of perjury?
I just graduated highschool a year ago and I can’t believe how much this reminds me of it. Not the story, just the mindset. Particularly the last two grades. While a lot of my peers were stressing over things like getting into university and “what course their life will take.” To me school was just a hiccup in-between doing things I wanted to do.
Now I’m going to second year of university though, things here are serious business. A bad mark in any coursework can have serious implications on the rest of my adult life!
PL: Ridiculous. Systems like that should be banished. they’re the prime reason so much of the corporate world is filled with idiot wind-up dolls. Push people through a rigid system like cattle and you’ll get cattle.
I wish I was this switched on at 18. Would it have made a difference to my life though? Probably not.
A++ Would read again.
PL: Thanks, but this isn’t “switched on.” This is a high school kid acting as certain breeds of high school kid will. I got switched on later.
None of your stories are about the surface. Your writing could be categorized as one long paper defending the way you perceive the world. It’s a good paper.
It’s also a good story and, as I have said before, I enjoy your writing. I suppose it matters to me because I believe most of your readers relate to you via the premise that you somehow grant them insight into a deeper sense of their own version of “the truth” (i.e. “you read my mind!” reactions.) By changing the variables around your main character (which happens to be you and this is unimportant) one can test the (macro-level of the) point of view you advocate. Unfortunately, such point of view does not survive precarious economical and existential situations where life is less valuable. In order to “get” you, one must be able to be “there” emotionally by complying with rebellious and cultural first-world requirements. (Note: you can even say that your musical references are nothing else than custom agents asking for passports to readers.) Whereas your strongest ally in this recreation of your past/world seems to be piercing logic, it doesn’t help those who live under a crippled version of Maslow’s Pyramid. 1+1 is not equal 2 to them. I’m not criticizing you at all. It’s probably a futile observation. The only value I can add is to suggest that your work would be difficult to translate. Stories about violence, sex, love, Kafka’s feelings of inadequacy, Vonnegut’s interplanetary solitude or an innocent young wizard going to magical places are easier on the mind than reinforced/culturally complex points of view.
This one time I was locked in a corporate office (accounting) for six months and I read everything you wrote. I’m a fan.
PL: That’s an interesting way of looking at it, one I hadn’t considered. Might explain a lot of the criticisms I get about the book. People from different backgrounds come to the material expecting different things, and it doesn’t translate universally. Hence, the book’s “cult” status… an inside handshake laugh for a certain type of mind. I also play the victim poorly, which is the standard trick used by most writers to appear grounded and “human” to readers. A submissive posture aggrandizes the audience by putting it in a position of power over the speaker. I’d rather skip the emotion and focus on deconstructing the logic, or lack thereof, exhibited.
Shrewd eye on the college thing, but not quite spot-on. I was a shade below Ivy, well up the charts. No “ne’er do well senator’s son” schooling.
Your observation on the music thing is brilliant, by the way. Yeah, that’s part of how it works. You might not be the first to note that, but you’re the first to articulate it so succinctly.
Much as you and I usually rail against narrative in society, sometimes it’s too convenient to not use. Personal gain trumps societal conviction.
PL: Couldn’t agree more. If a person can be manipulated via those triggers, he deserves what he gets. And you owe him no better.
I’ve been reading your old stuff again, particularly the comments in the Centralia piece and the essay about the bailout almost not going through. It’s trippy, and I welcome this future. It came just as I fucked my 3.6 to 2.bullshit, at the cost of learning a language and networking.
PL: I like huge messes. Like living in a permanent massive snowstorm. I like calm, but I’d be lying to say I don’t like watching things crater. It’s fascinating to watch.
Real Muthaphukkin Gs and Boyz N Tha Hood fucking classicsss. Shit, even Gimme Dat Nut was fucking awesome. CITY OF COMPTON!
I heard the combo of 40oz and OJ (obviously not the RB) was divine. Trying this very very soon.
PL: That probably would be good. The sweetness would cut the acidity of the juice nicely. Drinking 1/3 of the 40 and replacing it with a sweet whiskey is also a favorite for some.
Some who roll at a level most of us will never understand.
Eazy E’s been dead 14 years. 14 years.