<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Big Blank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philalawyer.net/2010/01/the-big-blank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philalawyer.net/2010/01/the-big-blank/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:31:16 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BL1Y</title>
		<link>http://philalawyer.net/2010/01/the-big-blank/comment-page-1/#comment-3223</link>
		<dc:creator>BL1Y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philalawyer.net/?p=917#comment-3223</guid>
		<description>Speak of the devil: http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/do_super_lawyer_designations_and_the_like_matter_to_you/

PL: Nice. About time. Dumb fucking marketing gimmick. Like any client ever reads that shit. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speak of the devil: <a href="http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/do_super_lawyer_designations_and_the_like_matter_to_you/" rel="nofollow">http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/do_super_lawyer_designations_and_the_like_matter_to_you/</a></p>
<p>PL: Nice. About time. Dumb fucking marketing gimmick. Like any client ever reads that shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: popo</title>
		<link>http://philalawyer.net/2010/01/the-big-blank/comment-page-1/#comment-3180</link>
		<dc:creator>popo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philalawyer.net/?p=917#comment-3180</guid>
		<description>&quot;Are these the Nazis, Walter?&quot;
&quot;No, Donny, these men are nihilists, there&#039;s nothing to be afraid of.&quot;

PL: I can never tire of &lt;em&gt;Lebowski&lt;/em&gt; quotes. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Are these the Nazis, Walter?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;No, Donny, these men are nihilists, there&#8217;s nothing to be afraid of.&#8221;</p>
<p>PL: I can never tire of <em>Lebowski</em> quotes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: long time reader</title>
		<link>http://philalawyer.net/2010/01/the-big-blank/comment-page-1/#comment-3179</link>
		<dc:creator>long time reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philalawyer.net/?p=917#comment-3179</guid>
		<description>Page, good stuff.

PL: I was inspired on this one.  Thanks.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Page, good stuff.</p>
<p>PL: I was inspired on this one.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guillermo</title>
		<link>http://philalawyer.net/2010/01/the-big-blank/comment-page-1/#comment-3177</link>
		<dc:creator>Guillermo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philalawyer.net/?p=917#comment-3177</guid>
		<description>I see your point about people being too cynical, but it&#039;s hard to fight for change growing up today. People who want to do good are split into two groups, one denies science and the other denies economics. Can you blame kids for seeing that both are completely full of shit, and focusing on getting drunk, laid, playing sports and making money for themselves. I think this generation will go down as one that was more cynical but more rational, but maybe we&#039;ll oversee Western civilization&#039;s downfall. Either way, Jersey Shore tonight kicked ass.

PL: I agree with you.  I think people are getting a lot more rational.  But it&#039;s worth reminding ourselves that the finish line of exclusively rational thought is nihilism.  Cautioning like that keeps folks a little more decent than they otherwise might be.  And its a neat topic to discuss - an existential hot button issue.  Causes people to consider whether we&#039;re more than mere accidents of an organic evolution.  That causes people to think about their &quot;values&quot; and things like that, which gives what could be a pedantic or overly-philosophical piece an amusing edginess.   Nobody ever lost readers inviting people to gnaw on, or at, sacred totems.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see your point about people being too cynical, but it&#8217;s hard to fight for change growing up today. People who want to do good are split into two groups, one denies science and the other denies economics. Can you blame kids for seeing that both are completely full of shit, and focusing on getting drunk, laid, playing sports and making money for themselves. I think this generation will go down as one that was more cynical but more rational, but maybe we&#8217;ll oversee Western civilization&#8217;s downfall. Either way, Jersey Shore tonight kicked ass.</p>
<p>PL: I agree with you.  I think people are getting a lot more rational.  But it&#8217;s worth reminding ourselves that the finish line of exclusively rational thought is nihilism.  Cautioning like that keeps folks a little more decent than they otherwise might be.  And its a neat topic to discuss &#8211; an existential hot button issue.  Causes people to consider whether we&#8217;re more than mere accidents of an organic evolution.  That causes people to think about their &#8220;values&#8221; and things like that, which gives what could be a pedantic or overly-philosophical piece an amusing edginess.   Nobody ever lost readers inviting people to gnaw on, or at, sacred totems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://philalawyer.net/2010/01/the-big-blank/comment-page-1/#comment-3175</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philalawyer.net/?p=917#comment-3175</guid>
		<description>Really entertaining recap of the decade.  I definitely take it as comedy though, rather than a truly serious analysis.  Although, there are clearly many truths included, which is the basis for the comedy.  

As for the future, the only thing you can be sure of, is that none of us have any idea of what is going to happen.  To assume that the economic future will look like a fast forwarded version of the 2000&#039;s is flawed thinking in my opinion.  This decades events were preceded by the unique decades beforehand.  Now that we already went through the 2000&#039;s, the ensuing decades will bring their own unique, unpredictable challenges.  I think it is a bit shortsighted, a bit being blinded by the moment, to assume that things will now always continue like this.  That is the same fallacy of thought the suckers use in getting in too late on booming industries.

I don&#039;t mean to diminish the article though.  I thoroughly enjoyed it and is surely some of your best work in my opinion.

PL: Of course every space of time people brand as an &quot;era&quot; has its own uniqueness.  But we write things to make people think, and take what they will from the words.  I personally don&#039;t think there&#039;s any such thing as a narrative.  They&#039;re all revisionist.  But if I couldn&#039;t give you a narrative, I couldn&#039;t write, and if I didn&#039;t write what I wrote, we wouldn&#039;t have this discussion, which might cause other people to think about whether the past predicts the future or is, as I believe, a bunch of things that just happened to have happened sometime before now.  

When I say I think something is going to happen, I don&#039;t base the conclusion on what happened before. To assert a certain cycle is being repeated isn&#039;t folly. It&#039;s assessment of the players and the formula they&#039;ve been using successfully, and the solid assumption that people will do what works for them until it doesn&#039;t work anymore... Among a whole lot of other empirical evidence that I&#039;d never have the time or inclination to cite in what aims to be, as you astutely note, an entertaining article.   

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really entertaining recap of the decade.  I definitely take it as comedy though, rather than a truly serious analysis.  Although, there are clearly many truths included, which is the basis for the comedy.  </p>
<p>As for the future, the only thing you can be sure of, is that none of us have any idea of what is going to happen.  To assume that the economic future will look like a fast forwarded version of the 2000&#8217;s is flawed thinking in my opinion.  This decades events were preceded by the unique decades beforehand.  Now that we already went through the 2000&#8217;s, the ensuing decades will bring their own unique, unpredictable challenges.  I think it is a bit shortsighted, a bit being blinded by the moment, to assume that things will now always continue like this.  That is the same fallacy of thought the suckers use in getting in too late on booming industries.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mean to diminish the article though.  I thoroughly enjoyed it and is surely some of your best work in my opinion.</p>
<p>PL: Of course every space of time people brand as an &#8220;era&#8221; has its own uniqueness.  But we write things to make people think, and take what they will from the words.  I personally don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any such thing as a narrative.  They&#8217;re all revisionist.  But if I couldn&#8217;t give you a narrative, I couldn&#8217;t write, and if I didn&#8217;t write what I wrote, we wouldn&#8217;t have this discussion, which might cause other people to think about whether the past predicts the future or is, as I believe, a bunch of things that just happened to have happened sometime before now.  </p>
<p>When I say I think something is going to happen, I don&#8217;t base the conclusion on what happened before. To assert a certain cycle is being repeated isn&#8217;t folly. It&#8217;s assessment of the players and the formula they&#8217;ve been using successfully, and the solid assumption that people will do what works for them until it doesn&#8217;t work anymore&#8230; Among a whole lot of other empirical evidence that I&#8217;d never have the time or inclination to cite in what aims to be, as you astutely note, an entertaining article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BL1Y</title>
		<link>http://philalawyer.net/2010/01/the-big-blank/comment-page-1/#comment-3174</link>
		<dc:creator>BL1Y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philalawyer.net/?p=917#comment-3174</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised, with your blog and book (which finally came in the mail a couple days ago) you didn&#039;t mention Long Tail economics.  Amazon, iTunes, Rhapsody, print on demand, etc...the little guy is getting exposed to a global market and becoming relevant once again.

PL: Have you finished the book?  That theme&#039;s in there. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised, with your blog and book (which finally came in the mail a couple days ago) you didn&#8217;t mention Long Tail economics.  Amazon, iTunes, Rhapsody, print on demand, etc&#8230;the little guy is getting exposed to a global market and becoming relevant once again.</p>
<p>PL: Have you finished the book?  That theme&#8217;s in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kai</title>
		<link>http://philalawyer.net/2010/01/the-big-blank/comment-page-1/#comment-3172</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 02:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philalawyer.net/?p=917#comment-3172</guid>
		<description>I turned ten in 99, and naturally turned twenty in 09, so this piece covers pretty much every important event I&#039;ve ever been able to observe and understand. This is not a good thing.

Just before reading this, is was thinking about how Hunter Thompson wrote of the feeling of being there in the mid- and late-sixties, and how it felt great to be a part of the collective existence in that time. I thought maybe I should write about how growing up through this decade was the exact antithesis of that, as if my existence has been cheapened by growing up through the years of shitty reality TV, shitty presidents and shitty business practices. It appears you&#039;ve already written it. Like you said, &quot;A lot of crazy, important stuff happened.&quot; But not really.

PL: The Sixties are ridiculously romanticized, I think.  When I&#039;ve ask people who lived through them whether it was anything like the media&#039;s portrayal, the answer seems to be, &quot;The music was a lot better and it was easy to get laid.&quot;  The protests and volcanic social upheaval don&#039;t seem to have been as ubiquitous as nostalgic documentaries would have us believe. 

...Or I&#039;ve just been asking squares.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I turned ten in 99, and naturally turned twenty in 09, so this piece covers pretty much every important event I&#8217;ve ever been able to observe and understand. This is not a good thing.</p>
<p>Just before reading this, is was thinking about how Hunter Thompson wrote of the feeling of being there in the mid- and late-sixties, and how it felt great to be a part of the collective existence in that time. I thought maybe I should write about how growing up through this decade was the exact antithesis of that, as if my existence has been cheapened by growing up through the years of shitty reality TV, shitty presidents and shitty business practices. It appears you&#8217;ve already written it. Like you said, &#8220;A lot of crazy, important stuff happened.&#8221; But not really.</p>
<p>PL: The Sixties are ridiculously romanticized, I think.  When I&#8217;ve ask people who lived through them whether it was anything like the media&#8217;s portrayal, the answer seems to be, &#8220;The music was a lot better and it was easy to get laid.&#8221;  The protests and volcanic social upheaval don&#8217;t seem to have been as ubiquitous as nostalgic documentaries would have us believe. </p>
<p>&#8230;Or I&#8217;ve just been asking squares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://philalawyer.net/2010/01/the-big-blank/comment-page-1/#comment-3171</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philalawyer.net/?p=917#comment-3171</guid>
		<description>This is one of the saddest, truest things you&#039;ve written--and as someone who writes a lot of things that are poignant in some way or another, and someone who writes a lot of true things, that&#039;s a significant statement.

I missed most of the decade, or at least was only vaguely aware of it, so maybe that&#039;s why I find this sad intellectually, but don&#039;t feel it properly. I grew up with nothing, it&#039;s what I understand best.

I&#039;m out of scotch, but that won&#039;t stop me from drinking something. Here&#039;s to nothing at all.

PL: Don&#039;t sweat the lack of substance.  There&#039;s no narrative and no point to anything but the one you make of it.  As Vonnegut said, &quot;We were put on this world to fart around, and don&#039;t let anyone tell you anything different.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the saddest, truest things you&#8217;ve written&#8211;and as someone who writes a lot of things that are poignant in some way or another, and someone who writes a lot of true things, that&#8217;s a significant statement.</p>
<p>I missed most of the decade, or at least was only vaguely aware of it, so maybe that&#8217;s why I find this sad intellectually, but don&#8217;t feel it properly. I grew up with nothing, it&#8217;s what I understand best.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m out of scotch, but that won&#8217;t stop me from drinking something. Here&#8217;s to nothing at all.</p>
<p>PL: Don&#8217;t sweat the lack of substance.  There&#8217;s no narrative and no point to anything but the one you make of it.  As Vonnegut said, &#8220;We were put on this world to fart around, and don&#8217;t let anyone tell you anything different.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blank</title>
		<link>http://philalawyer.net/2010/01/the-big-blank/comment-page-1/#comment-3169</link>
		<dc:creator>Blank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 05:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philalawyer.net/?p=917#comment-3169</guid>
		<description>Something about your post just reminds me of 1984, where we have production for production&#039;s sake, with no real meaning behind it. How we handle entertainment is the equivalent of how they handled history. It&#039;s all a bunch of bullshit, and to be honest, the system needs to come down (in flames or not) before any real work can be done.

A mass jubilee. That&#039;s what the world needs. A blank slate where we can all start over and live our lives to the fullest while being sensible about it. Alas, Wall Street execs will still continue to claim increased profit margins by laying off workers until they&#039;re the only ones left.

PL: No one has to borrow from the banks.  It&#039;s a pusher/junkie relationship.  But now, given where we&#039;re headed, there&#039;s a chance we&#039;ll finally be forced to break it.  I wonder how long they can keep cranking out trading profits when consumption and economic activity all but dries up from lack of liquidity on the street.  Volatility from uncertainty, confusion and manipulation by those with a handle on this market will last for some time, but once that peters out, and China stalls from lack of US consumption, ending that bubble, where will the hot money and traders go?  They&#039;ll find a place, I guess.  They always do.  But there will be less of them.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something about your post just reminds me of 1984, where we have production for production&#8217;s sake, with no real meaning behind it. How we handle entertainment is the equivalent of how they handled history. It&#8217;s all a bunch of bullshit, and to be honest, the system needs to come down (in flames or not) before any real work can be done.</p>
<p>A mass jubilee. That&#8217;s what the world needs. A blank slate where we can all start over and live our lives to the fullest while being sensible about it. Alas, Wall Street execs will still continue to claim increased profit margins by laying off workers until they&#8217;re the only ones left.</p>
<p>PL: No one has to borrow from the banks.  It&#8217;s a pusher/junkie relationship.  But now, given where we&#8217;re headed, there&#8217;s a chance we&#8217;ll finally be forced to break it.  I wonder how long they can keep cranking out trading profits when consumption and economic activity all but dries up from lack of liquidity on the street.  Volatility from uncertainty, confusion and manipulation by those with a handle on this market will last for some time, but once that peters out, and China stalls from lack of US consumption, ending that bubble, where will the hot money and traders go?  They&#8217;ll find a place, I guess.  They always do.  But there will be less of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://philalawyer.net/2010/01/the-big-blank/comment-page-1/#comment-3168</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philalawyer.net/?p=917#comment-3168</guid>
		<description>When it all comes tumbling down, and we&#039;re left to fend for ourselves in ramshackle villages built atop the rubble of our own skyscrapers and hubris, I want you to know that you&#039;ll have my vote for Head Warlord. Keep up the good work.

PL: I&#039;ve lead nothing in life but my fraternity&#039;s social fund, and I think that&#039;s about as far as my political career will ever get.  But thanks.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it all comes tumbling down, and we&#8217;re left to fend for ourselves in ramshackle villages built atop the rubble of our own skyscrapers and hubris, I want you to know that you&#8217;ll have my vote for Head Warlord. Keep up the good work.</p>
<p>PL: I&#8217;ve lead nothing in life but my fraternity&#8217;s social fund, and I think that&#8217;s about as far as my political career will ever get.  But thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
