Archive for the ‘Book Excerpts’ Category
October 27th, 2009 by PhilaLawyer
And you may ask yourself-well…how did I get here? – Talking Heads, “Once in a Lifetime”
That line played in my head a lot during my tour of the legal industry in Philadelphia. But never with more of a hook, or greater gravity, than during an odd moment where, for reasons I can’t explain, I found myself observing a local Trial Lawyer’s gala. In a situation like that, all I could do was shake my head, sip my drink and wonder, Seriously… How in the fuck did I get here?
For the past week of the promotion of the new Happy Hour is for Amateurs paperback, we’ve beaten up on the billable hour lawyers. Made fun of their out sized egos and myriad social dysfunctions, attacked their 18th century billing model… But that’s only half the story. This excerpt from the book covers their counterparts – the guys who file the lawsuits, otherwise known as “Plaintiffs” lawyers. I’d give you a little more but that might ruin the picture. Better to let the description do the talking. See if I haven’t nailed the funnier angles of the tribe:
A Crowd for Radio
October 21st, 2009 by PhilaLawyer
“Scratch any cynic and you’ll find a disappointed idealist.” Carlin nailed that one on the head. But he should have taken it further. Scratch the pious and you’ll find a deviant. Scratch the flirty and you’ll find a lousy lay. The teetotaler and you’ll find a closeted solvent sniffer, the liberal and you’ll find a tax cheat… The list goes on forever, but it all comes down to this point: The Surface is just the surface, and no, it’s not Reality.
We’ve all got a closet full of masks, and nothing reminds you of that like sitting in a stodgy club – one of those musty, Republican joints… a place Alex P. Keaton would have loved, or you could imagine Tucker Carlson holding court – admiring The Polite around you and wondering as you sip your whiskey, “Are these people thinking what I’m thinking? …What they all might look like naked? How the couplings might shake out if the place were to erupt in an orgy like something out of Eyes Wide Shut?”
The blue haired geriatric woman with the moustache would probably go for the guy in the bow tie – the one with the Mormon haircut. But he’s deeply closeted. He’d try for the maitre’d. The cougar in the corner’d want the server – the skinny foreign kid. And she’d want everyone to watch. The jowly couple just off the kitchen? They’d go at each other on the table. And the only question there is what condiments they’d add into the act. He’s obviously a cocktail sauce guy, but from the way she’s lathering those rolls, if there’s one thing that’s abundantly clear, the woman is all about the butter.* Perhaps they’ll meet in the middle… use that gravy boat of blue cheese dressing?
It’s enough to tease a weak gag reflex.
You’d like to think to think the whole room’s thinking that. And maybe the sick bastards are. Running lurid movies in their heads, all equally bored to tears. But they’d never admit it. And neither will you. You’ll just sit there and smile and drink – another brushed-cut, buttoned-down Average Well-Mannered Male. “Fresh pepper for iceberg salad?” “Yes, thank you.”
But beware of the physics in these places. Every action spurs a reaction, and the stiffer the setting you’re in, the more stiff drinks you’ll down. This slice of Happy Hour Is for Amateurs is about an evening at one of the dustier, white-bread dinner clubs in Philadelphia – the start of a brutal bender that eventually lead to one my greater professional embarrassments:
Lit Up in Stiff City
______________________________
* Insert your own Last Tango in Paris joke here.
October 20th, 2009 by PhilaLawyer
I’ve got two things today. The first is a slice of Happy Hour is for Amateurs dealing with the bane of every associate’s existence, and every client’s pocketbook – billable hours. If you know anything about the legal profession, you’ve heard how they’re routinely inflated. Heard of the studies showing that 20, 30% of lawyers pad their time. You might have read an article I did with the guys at Bitterlawyer.com outlining the more subtle forms of it.
No need to rehash that here. We all know how the recent “law-firms-as-unit-salesman” model has compelled all sorts of fraud. This piece addresses a different issue – a more finite, amusing one… How a lawyer allegedly billing 2400 hours a year – and yes, that’s exceedingly common – could achieve such an amazing feat:
2400 Hours
The second thing I have is a review of the book, one that just appeared last night. “Why cite this?” you might be thinking. There’s a simple reason for that. When I started writing the book, some people were critical of the approach taken. Said you couldn’t vein a serious message through three hundred pages of obnoxious humor. Said we either had to aim for the frat boys who read one book a year, or the serious readers who’d only respond to a conveniently redemptive and re-affirming message, but that doing both was doom. My editors and I disagreed. Both are offensive conceits, built on awful stereotypes. The “frat boys” read a lot more than you think, and the truly “serious” book readers – those who read not to have their assumptions reinforced, but challenged – consume a lot of twisted literature. This reviewer understood… grasped how the comedy and the message of Happy Hour traded off one another. It’s nice when someone really gets it.
This is also a bit gratuitous. Nobody’s written a line like this about the book before: “Fight Club is a poor man’s Happy Hour is for Amateurs. That’s not a jab at good ole Chuck, just the truth.” I’ve never written for critics. But I’ll take those props where I can.
October 19th, 2009 by PhilaLawyer
“Hall hath no fury like a spurned woman,” the old saying goes. And “Hell hath no fury like a spurned bureaucrat,” Milton Friedman famously corrected. I’d agree that both are damn angry sorts, but neither, I think, is the worst. There’s an animal far more annoying, more petty, nasty and grating – insufferably, perpetually infuriating.
Yes, I’m talking about the “Napoleon.” The “Little Guy” we all know from the office who’s been gifted a position of power and never lets anyone forget it – inflicts himself on all of those around him. Yes, he was virgin past twenty. Yes, he took his cousin to the prom. And, of course, he was the head hall monitor. But now he’s a man of peerage – a white collar mid-level vassal, with “Esquire” or “Vice President” in his title.
And the fiefs below him Will Pay.
You run into countless Napoleons in law. Every fifth office seems to house another. This slice of Happy Hour is for Amateurs is about a run-in I had with one during my first law firm interview, a particularly odd morning I’d started off by getting hit by a car (the rest of that background’s in the book):
Breakfast with Napoleon
October 16th, 2009 by PhilaLawyer
This piece of Happy Hour is for Amateurs deals with an exceedingly common subject – the boss who lives to torture his workers. But as much as we’ve all known his kind, toiled under his constant irritation, the question is, What do you call him? You can spot what makes him what he is. The undiagnosed Asperger’s Syndrome, the mid-life recognition he’s trapped in a profoundly insignificant life… the family he’d love to leave, with the Zoloft-tranquilized wife, Ritalin-addled brats and their heaving tuition costs. And yet as obvious as all that is, no easy label fits. This is where he’s undefinable, inscrutable – where no species or genus applies.
Or perhaps that’s all wrong, the worst kind of over-thinking, missing a plain-as-day answer. Maybe he’s the simplest of creatures, and the only thing making him a mystery is a Jeckyll and Hyde inconsistency.
I’ll never know for certain. But I’ve analyzed this animal at length. Worked with experts in the field, applied the most rigorous testing. And though a sure diagnosis still eludes me, there have been those blessed epiphanies, the occasional “Eureka” moments. In the interests of science, of animal behavior and anthropology… in the spirit of the greats from Darwin to Dawkins to Desmond Morris, a case study for your consideration:
Sudden Asshole Syndrome*
________________________
* Again, you may need to rotate the PDF file counterclockwise to read the piece.
October 15th, 2009 by PhilaLawyer
This slice of Happy Hour is for Amateurs covers something I’ve talked about in the past – the “3:1 Ratio.” Something everyone from twenty-two to forty will recognize. Well, everyone who values his or her time… who demands that every hour in the office be matched by, or obliterated from memory with, an equivalent hour spent “blowing the carbon out of the cylinders.” As the subtitle of the chapter notes, it’s a study on “The Art of Balance.” …And a few other things:
Three-to-One
_____________________________
* PDF link may require counterclockwise rotation in Adobe.
October 13th, 2009 by PhilaLawyer
When I set out to write Happy Hour is for Amateurs, there weren’t any gimmicks to the book. No clever marketing bullshit, just exactly what the Author’s Note says:
[A] funny riff on a funny time that happens to have some important points jammed in the mix– the written version of the discussion we might have if we sat down over a bottle of Maker’s Mark and you said, ‘Tell me about the last ten years. And entertain me.’
On style and delivery, the aim was equally simple – to write the damn thing well. Better than the average book.
We must have done something right, because now it’s out in paperback. And the roll-out for the softcover here will be as simple as it was for the hardcover. To anyone who hasn’t bought the book, we’re going to put up excerpts of it over the coming week or so… Let the prose of the thing do the marketing.*
The first is “1998,” the introductory chapter. This one will be a lot longer than any other excerpt, as it’s an Amazon link, and the company decided to make the piece available in its entirety. People seem to like this chapter. Several have told me it sold them on the book. Hope you enjoy it.
And as always, to those who’ve bought the book, thank you.
____________________________
* There is one difference. These won’t be out-takes of first drafts of passages, like the “Nuggets” pieces. These will be actual slices of the book, in PDF format. Because they are actual text from the book, however, they will only remain up for a very limited period of time.
August 2nd, 2009 by PhilaLawyer
A riff on the difference between narratives and alibis, and a bit of juvenile delinquency, cut from Happy Hour is for Amateurs:
You can’t succeed in law without lying. It’s just a simple fact. But you also can’t make things up. How do you thread the needle? With something we know as the “narrative.”
One of my earliest experiences with narratives was in high school, senior year. After I’d already been accepted to college, and there was little, if any, point in even showing up for classes. I was drinking 40s of malt liquor with buddies in the parking lot and walked into a morning assembly late. The vice principal at the time, a strange, disturbing man, grabbed me at the conclusion and dragged me to his office. All I could think the whole way down the corridor was Where the hell are my breath mints? Did I leave them in the fucking locker? And Whatever the defense is this time, it had better be damned solid. The V.P. was a king crawling creep, and our previous run-ins had been rough. I didn’t like the guy – couldn’t, and wouldn’t, respect him. I’d seen him hanging around gym classes, fawning over a couple wrestlers. Nothing overtly untoward, but his appearances seemed more than coincidence. The timing was near impeccable. That and the look on his face – the way he’d pat kids on the shoulders and stare while we were playing basketball. The guy had these huge black pupils, as if his eyes were permanently dilated. Never showed an expression. Just stood there with his arms across his chest, his thin, flimsy torso hunched inward, planted on a set fat old woman’s hips.
I didn’t know much at that age, but I was certain of this on instinct: A man isn’t supposed to look like that.
He’d nailed me just a few weeks before, on the silliest of minor offenses. I’d shown up late for school, with an explanation that my computer hadn’t been working. Had to stop at my mother’s office to print out a history paper due that day. He wouldn’t accept the excuse, signed by my mother or not. I’d reminded him who paid his salary, that in any logical estimation of the hierarchy at hand, the customer was always right. This didn’t go over well.
I’ll bet if I offered to take off my shirt for you in the boy’s locker room this negotiation would go differently.
Now here I was again. And worse, getting busted for drinking at school, zero tolerance shit. They’d call my folks in for a meeting, make me do charity work for some rehab facility – royal fucking annoyances.
Can’t you just leave me alone? I’ve already been accepted to two colleges better than eighty percent of the kids in this place. You don’t like me, I don’t like you, but who really gives a shit? You go back to your office; I’ll behave through my classes. In a few months’ time, we’ll never see each other again. There’s nothing at all to be gained by laying on the Billy Budd treatment.
Sometimes that pitch has a chance… but not with a man like this. A childlike reverence for “duty,” a mechanized approach to procedure – these things eclipsed his common sense. Or provided a pretext for vindictiveness. I’ll teach you a lesson, you little shit.
I’d been in this spot before – had an odd problem with authority through most of my young adult life. Never bucked it for spite, never went looking for trouble. When it found me, though, and it would, I’d treat it like an irritation. Take their punishment in stride. Chalk it up as a lesson. But they always wanted more – deference, remorse… a concession that they knew best, that my apologies were more than lip service. More than a survival response you offer when you’re under the stick.
All I could offer was attention, and that only because I’d been caught. Who was I to affirm them, and who were they to demand it? And why the fuck even ask? What on Earth is the value of an 18 year old’s validation? An offer of false contrition from the mouth of an adolescent male? “Yes, sir. For a second there, five minutes ago, sandwiched between thinking about where I’m next going to fuck my girlfriend and who’ll be throwing a keg party this weekend, it struck me – just how majestic and infallible your rule book is. Thank you for showing me the light.” How do you “kiss the ring” of someone ridiculous enough to demand that kind of vacant tribute?
The V.P. got behind his desk, adjusted his collar and started the Fifth Degree:
“You came into assembly late.”
“I had car trouble. It’s an old truck.”
“You came in late and went to the men’s room twice. And your eyes are glazed.”
“I have a personal issue. A family matter.”
“Oh really?”
“Yes, really.”
“What exactly.”
“I’ve been upset.”
“About what?”
“We’ve had a death in the family.” Which was true. An aunt I saw maybe once every two or three years had passed away suddenly and unexpectedly a few days before, killed in an accident. I hadn’t known the woman very well, but she was hooking me up huge right here.
“A death in the family?”
“An aunt.”
“I’m–well, uh…” He couldn’t bring himself to “sorry,” even sarcastically.
“It’s just… you know… So shocking. How a person is gone like that.”
This is where I tell you I felt guilty about using that bit. And I guess if I were writing the kind of book that was aimed at the kind of reader who needs that sort of apology, that’s exactly the one I’d be making. But this isn’t that book, you’re not that reader, and if there’d ever been any remorse, these words wouldn’t be here, and I wouldn’t be snickering as I type them. No, the situation here was serious, beyond those provincial concerns. There wouldn’t be mercy for truth, and there was nothing to gain from hedging. The only solution was a call-out. Test the son of a bitch.
He’d have had me dead to rights if he were the kind of man who’d push things. I smelled like a wino and all he had to do was lean in and sniff my breath. That and get beyond the mutually exclusive options – rather than assuming one story true and the other false, considering both might be fact. That yes, there’d been a death in the family, and also, yes, I’d been drinking. He didn’t take either tack. Just sat there looking at his phone, the gears turning in his head. Do I call the kid’s cards? Ring his folks to verify the story? How awkward could this get?
Very.
In the context of an either/or scenario, I was holding an ace, and he was as slow and predictable as any other lifelong rule custodian, but hardly an outright fool. It didn’t take a trainload of brains to gauge how this thing would cut. Door Number One? I’m crazy. Crazy and drunk and the mere suggestion of a call to my family breaks me – gets me whiny and apologetic. But he was holding his hand near the phone, trying to goad me into cracking and I wasn’t saying a word. Not because that was my “play.” Just because I didn’t want to speak. I wasn’t sure how bad I smelled, but I knew Olde English 800. Its scent stuck on your breath like garlic. Sweet, with a hint of rotting fruit, like the stink of Thunderbird on the drunks who bought us the stuff.*
Door Number Two? I’m serious. He calls my folks and confirms the story and then he’s stuck looking weak – stuttering like the principal apologizing to “George Peterson” in Ferris Bueller’s Day Off. I sit there across the desk, watching his hand get called, and trumped. Then I joke about the incident with friends, and in addition to dearth of respect the guy already has among students – being a slope shouldered, middle-aged virgin in a thankless, payless position – he’s got to sit in his office knowing a pack of rotten shits is laughing as they imagine him blubbering. “Oh, well… I’m sorry for your loss then. It’s just that your son– He seemed… Well, nevermi– Please accept my condolences.”
In either case, he wasn’t going to win. I had a bulletproof “narrative” – the only thing better in the dock than a detailed alibi. Some people don’t see the difference, and that’s strange because they’re nothing alike. An alibi’s a set of facts, tactile and easy to test. You can prove one or two didn’t happen, or at least put their veracity in question. And from there, true or not, the rest of the story is suspect. Narrative’s lying via spin – sticking to the actual events, fabricating their impact. And in a situation like mine, where the only witness to the crime was the accused, all that can ever matter is what comes from the advocate’s mouth.
And so we sat for a moment or two, him looking at me, me looking at him, both of us knowing what had happened, and why it’d never be admitted. Prove what I’m saying’s untrue. That these glassy eyes are from booze, and not from the pain of loss.
“Get back to class and understand… I’m watching you.” He waved me out of his office.
Of course you are.
______________________________
* The 8 Ball gets you every time.
June 22nd, 2009 by PhilaLawyer
This is an outtake from the initial draft of Happy Hour is for Amateurs addressing a subject with which most of us who work in offices for any length of time are quite familiar – daydreaming through your job. Most think it’s a simple reaction to boredom. I agree, but I also think it’s a defense mechanism, a healthy sign you’re normal.
I’ve worked in an office most of my adult life, but never really, fully been there. Anything I see or hear can take me from the moment, set me thinking about something entirely disconnected from everything I’m doing. Any image or sound I come across – the slightest stimulus providing a hint of a basis to start my imagination racing away from Where I’m Stuck. An advertisement for cheap plane tickets on a passing city bus will have me running a reel on what it might be like in Prague that time of year through the balance of most of the morning. A disc jockey’s joke about George Bush crackling out of a radio in the bodega where I pick up the newspaper leaves me musing on what the administration’s plan was – what the end game might have been in that seemingly mindless war, and why we can’t seem to get the oil spigots flowing. Perhaps a conspiracy’s afoot – some nasty plan between the administration and oil companies. But how would the delay help? What would their aim be?
Sometimes it’s just that random image or sound repeating over and over like some warped form of meditation – focusing the mind on an odd, innocuous distraction. And once it’s locked in my head, it’ll often stay for hours, jammed on a rerun loop. I’ll find myself humming and half-singing “Panama” under my breath in the line at the Starbucks on Market Street, unaware as to why – forgetting I’d just heard the song blasting from a car at a stoplight. And the playback’s always vivid. I’ll be standing there, salivating over the first caffeine fix of the day, moving in sync with the line, pulling the dollars out of my pocket and readying myself to pay, in every outward manifestation totally enveloped in the act of preparing for a day at the office. But in my head it’s a different story. The spoken word “solo” near the end of the song is rolling.
I reach down, between my legs… and ease the seat back… The video of the song plays in the background, as immediate and electric as it was when I was thirteen on my parents’ couch, watching it on MTV. She’s blinding, I’m flying… Right behind the rear-view mirror now… David Lee Roth’s sailing over the stage on a suspension pulley above Eddie Van Halen and Michael Anthony, and for a second I’m wondering what it was like in the dressing room after one of their shows – just how many groupies were involved in the orgies. Piston’s popping… Ain’t no stopping now…
“Sir, what size?”
“What?”
“What size?”
“Oh… Venti.”
(more…)
March 9th, 2009 by PhilaLawyer
Author’s Note: Describing the typical “cut throat” or uber-law student was one of the hardest challenges in the book. We chose to go with something called an “Angry Insignificant,” but there were many other descriptions. Here’s one anybody who’s been in the delivery business, or a waiter, will probably recognize.
It’s said a legal education breaks down people’s minds – dismantles the way they think, scorches any arrogance or confidence they have in their native powers of analysis and persuasion and rebuilds their brain circuitry in the classic lawyer framework. I don’t know about that. I think you actually have to attend law school on a regular basis, rather than merely enroll and occasionally wander through the library for that malady to take full effect. But I will tell you this: The first moments of law school can absolutely murder your self esteem. For a shocking, horrific instant, you realize what you’re seeing is something you’re part of now – on at least some minor level a mirror of what you’ll become. Or a frightening reminder of just how impossibly drunk and stoned you really were through college.
I took a test and applied for this? Was I sniffing fucking solvents?
As I stood in line in lobby, absorbing the conversations around me and watching the bodies shuffling about, I realized I’d seen this all before. Not in a déjà vu manner, but a real, tactile sense, like I was watching an exhibit of species I’d viewed in another zoo. Something about the hunched spine and straw hair of the kid in the Megadeth t-shirt in front of me and the snorting, nasally exhortations of the lumpy men in short sleeve oxfords to my right dredged up memories of another place. But where? What? It wasn’t memorable enough to come back instantly, just enough to recognize. Something about the scene rendered it so familiar, so home, but also so foreboding. The nervous, forced laughter and jerky body language. The beady eyes shifting away the instant you met them. The thud, thud, thud of the flatfooted library jockeys pushing bifocals up on their noses, sweating and wheezing from the walk up the stairs. I knew these types well, dealt with their breed before. Been a victim of some of their kind, and not so long ago.
(more…)
|